<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dual-core or Quad-core?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/</link>
	<description>Everything about Laptops</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:10:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Evolution of Laptop CPU&#8217;s &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evolution of Laptop CPU&#8217;s &#8211; Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>[...] Core 2 Merom: Intel’s 2nd Mobile Dual-Core CPU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Core 2 Merom: Intel’s 2nd Mobile Dual-Core CPU [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Core i5 Laptops &#171; Laptops and Netbooks</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Core i5 Laptops &#171; Laptops and Netbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>[...] first multi-core to arrive was the Dual Core technology, spearheaded by the Pentium Dual Core by Intel and the subsequent ones by AMD. Through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first multi-core to arrive was the Dual Core technology, spearheaded by the Pentium Dual Core by Intel and the subsequent ones by AMD. Through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After quad core comes, core i7 laptops. &#171; Laptops and Netbooks</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>After quad core comes, core i7 laptops. &#171; Laptops and Netbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>[...] year ago people where asking, quad core laptop or duo core laptop. Thing have moved on and the current latest and greatest is Core i7 laptops.  The Intel Core i7 is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year ago people where asking, quad core laptop or duo core laptop. Thing have moved on and the current latest and greatest is Core i7 laptops.  The Intel Core i7 is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabi</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>To Paddy:
For iMac 27&quot; it is better to go for quad-core. Since its Apple so I would think that all softwares installed in iMac are already optimized to work in quad-core environment. 
But for PC world the case is different, since softwares are from different vendors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Paddy:<br />
For iMac 27&#8243; it is better to go for quad-core. Since its Apple so I would think that all softwares installed in iMac are already optimized to work in quad-core environment.<br />
But for PC world the case is different, since softwares are from different vendors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Interesting points above.  I&#039;m trying to decide between a dual and quad core myself for the latest 27&quot; iMac.  I do alot of 3D and 2D graphic work, video and renderings.  Would anybody have any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points above.  I&#8217;m trying to decide between a dual and quad core myself for the latest 27&#8243; iMac.  I do alot of 3D and 2D graphic work, video and renderings.  Would anybody have any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-319</guid>
		<description>You make some great points, but I think that it&#039;s all determinant on what you personally need and can afford. If a dual core fits your needs, then you might as well save the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some great points, but I think that it&#8217;s all determinant on what you personally need and can afford. If a dual core fits your needs, then you might as well save the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Chang</title>
		<link>http://laptops-and-netbooks.com/2009/07/10/dual-core-or-quad-core/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laptop-computers.co.za/wp/?p=262#comment-113</guid>
		<description>For stability and multi-tasking speed, I&#039;ve found it&#039;s better to have two dual core CPUs on a machine instead of one quad core (assuming CPU speed is the same).  This leads to fewer crashes and stalls when anti-virus, anti-spyware, windows update, etc. run in the background under Windows XP.

I&#039;ve been using a 4 core computer since 2005.  That system had two dual core Xenon CPUs.  I&#039;ve also used a quad core Xenon later.  In 208, I used a dual quad core Xenon with 8 cores and it ran faster than dual core cpu&#039;s with slightly higher ghz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For stability and multi-tasking speed, I&#8217;ve found it&#8217;s better to have two dual core CPUs on a machine instead of one quad core (assuming CPU speed is the same).  This leads to fewer crashes and stalls when anti-virus, anti-spyware, windows update, etc. run in the background under Windows XP.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using a 4 core computer since 2005.  That system had two dual core Xenon CPUs.  I&#8217;ve also used a quad core Xenon later.  In 208, I used a dual quad core Xenon with 8 cores and it ran faster than dual core cpu&#8217;s with slightly higher ghz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
